The Weber Number — Inertia vs. Surface Tension
“Why are raindrops spherical? Why does an inkjet droplet land precisely without spattering? Why does diesel fuel shatter into micron-scale droplets inside a combustion chamber? The Weber number governs all of these — it is the gatekeeper of every fluid interface.”
1. Introduction
In large-scale flows — rivers, ocean currents, pipe networks — surface tension is negligible and can safely be ignored. But whenever the characteristic length scale shrinks to millimetres or below, or whenever high-speed flow impinges on a fluid interface, surface tension becomes a dominant force. The Weber number (We) quantifies the competition between inertial forces, which tend to deform and break interfaces, and surface tension, which resists deformation and drives interfaces toward minimum-area (spherical) shapes.
The Weber number answers: Does flow have enough inertia to overcome surface tension and rupture the interface? Its value governs droplet formation, jet stability, bubble dynamics, spray atomisation, inkjet printing, and the sinking-funnel problem of IYPT 2027.
Definition and Parameters
$$We = rac{
ho v^2 L}{sigma}$$
- $
ho$ — fluid density (kg/m³) - $v$ — characteristic velocity (m/s)
- $L$ — characteristic length: droplet/bubble diameter, jet radius, or nozzle diameter (m)
- $sigma$ — surface tension coefficient (N/m)
Dimensional check: $[
ho v^2 L/sigma] = ( ext{kg/m}^3)( ext{m}^2/ ext{s}^2)( ext{m})/( ext{N/m}) = ext{Pa·m}/( ext{N/m}) = ext{dimensionless}$.
Alternatively: $We = F_{inertia}/F_{surface,tension} sim (
ho v^2 L^2)/(sigma L) =
ho v^2 L/sigma$.
2. Historical Note
Moritz Weber (1871–1951) was a German mechanical engineer and professor at the Technische Hochschule Berlin. In 1919 he systematised the theory of dynamic similarity for flows involving viscosity and surface tension, introducing what became known as the Weber number. Weber was motivated by the need to correctly scale model experiments of ship propellers and hydraulic machinery — situations where surface tension effects at model scale could corrupt the results if not properly accounted for.
3. Physical Interpretation
Consider a liquid jet of radius $r$ or a droplet of diameter $d$. Two competing forces act:
- Inertial pressure: $Delta p_{inertia} sim
ho v^2$ — dynamic pressure driving deformation - Laplace pressure: $Delta p_{Laplace} = 2sigma/r$ — excess pressure inside a curved interface resisting deformation
Their ratio for characteristic length $L = 2r = d$:
$$We = rac{
ho v^2 L}{sigma} sim rac{Delta p_{inertia}}{Delta p_{Laplace}}$$
| We value | Regime | Interface behaviour | Examples |
|---|---|---|---|
| We < 1 | Surface-tension dominated | Interface intact, droplet spherical | Morning dew, soap bubble |
| We ~ 1 | Transitional | Droplet deforms but survives | Light drizzle |
| 1 < We < 12 | Moderate inertia | Deformation without breakup | Moderate rain, dripping tap |
| We ≈ 12 | Critical breakup | Bag breakup onset for single droplet in airflow | Windscreen raindrop |
| We >> 12 | Inertia dominated | Catastrophic breakup, atomisation | Diesel injector, spray nozzle |
4. Rayleigh–Plateau Instability — Jet Breakup
A cylindrical liquid jet of radius $r_0$ is always unstable to perturbations with wavelength $lambda > 2pi r_0$. Rayleigh (1879) showed that the fastest-growing perturbation has wavenumber $kr_0 pprox 0.697$, producing droplets of diameter:
$$d_{drop} pprox 1.89, d_{jet}$$
The growth rate of perturbations scales as $omega sim sqrt{sigma/(
ho r_0^3)}$. The Weber number controls whether the jet breaks in the dripping regime (low We, large droplets form near the nozzle) or the jetting regime (moderate We, jet extends several diameters before breaking) or the atomisation regime (high We, chaotic breakup very close to the nozzle).
Worked Example 1: Water Jet from a Garden Hose
A garden hose nozzle produces a jet of diameter $d_{jet} = 5$ mm at velocity $v = 3$ m/s. Water: $
ho = 1000$ kg/m³, $sigma = 0.073$ N/m.
Weber number:
$$We = rac{1000 imes 3^2 imes 0.005}{0.073} = rac{45}{0.073} = 616$$
Predicted drop diameter: $d_{drop} pprox 1.89 imes 5 ext{ mm} = 9.5 ext{ mm}$ (primary breakup estimate).
In reality, secondary aerodynamic breakup reduces this further since $We_{drop,air} =
ho_{air} v^2 d_{drop}/sigma = 1.2 imes 9 imes 0.0095/0.073 pprox 1.4$, just above critical for deformation. Final drop size ≈ 3–5 mm — consistent with garden-hose experience.
5. Droplet Breakup Mechanisms
When a droplet of liquid travels through a gas stream, the aerodynamic pressure distorts and ultimately fragments it. The breakup morphology depends on We:
| We range | Breakup mode | Description |
|---|---|---|
| We < 12 | None (stable) | Droplet deforms but remains intact |
| 12–18 | Bag breakup | Droplet inflates into a bag then bursts |
| 18–45 | Stripping / multimode | Thin sheets stripped from droplet rim |
| 45–350 | Wave crest stripping | Surface waves grow and shed ligaments |
| > 350 | Catastrophic breakup | Explosive fragmentation into fine mist |
Worked Example 2: Rain Droplet Stability in a Storm
A raindrop of diameter $d = 4$ mm falls at terminal velocity $v_t pprox 9$ m/s. Will it break apart in air ($
ho_{air} = 1.2$ kg/m³, $sigma_{water} = 0.073$ N/m)?
$$We = rac{1.2 imes 9^2 imes 0.004}{0.073} = rac{0.389}{0.073} = 5.33$$
$We = 5.3 < 12$: the drop is stable against breakup but significantly deformed (oblate spheroid). This explains why natural raindrops are not perfectly spherical. Drops larger than ~5.5 mm would have We > 12 and break up, which is why observed raindrops rarely exceed 5–6 mm.
6. The Ohnesorge Number — Adding Viscosity
When viscosity is also important (e.g., in inkjet printing, polymer sprays, biological fluids), a third parameter is needed. The Ohnesorge number combines We and the Reynolds number Re:
$$Oh = rac{mu}{sqrt{
ho sigma L}} = rac{sqrt{We}}{Re}$$
$Oh$ compares viscous damping to the inertia–surface-tension restoring force. The Ohnesorge diagram (log$,Oh$ vs. log$,We$) maps the complete phase space of drop and jet behaviour into distinct regimes: dripping, jetting, and atomisation. This diagram is the primary design tool for inkjet nozzles, agricultural sprayers, and pharmaceutical inhalers.
The Dimensionless Trinity for Drop Dynamics
$$We = rac{
ho v^2 L}{sigma}, qquad Re = rac{
ho v L}{mu}, qquad Oh = rac{sqrt{We}}{Re} = rac{mu}{sqrt{
ho sigma L}}$$
- Large We, small Oh: atomisation (diesel injector)
- Small We, small Oh: dripping (slow faucet)
- Intermediate We: stable jetting (Rayleigh regime)
- Large Oh: viscous damping suppresses instability (honey)
Worked Example 3: Inkjet Printing Nozzle Design
An inkjet nozzle produces droplets of diameter $d = 25, mu ext{m}$ at velocity $v = 6$ m/s. Ink properties: $
ho = 1040$ kg/m³, $mu = 2 imes10^{-3}$ Pa·s, $sigma = 0.028$ N/m.
$$We = rac{1040 imes 36 imes 25 imes10^{-6}}{0.028} = rac{0.936}{0.028} = 33.4$$
$$Re = rac{1040 imes 6 imes 25 imes10^{-6}}{2 imes10^{-3}} = rac{0.156}{2 imes10^{-3}} = 78$$
$$Oh = rac{sqrt{33.4}}{78} = rac{5.78}{78} = 0.074$$
$Oh pprox 0.074$ is in the ideal inkjet printability window ($0.1 < 1/Oh < 10$, or equivalently $0.1 < Oh < 10$ with some authors using $Z = 1/Oh$). The drop forms cleanly without satellites at these parameters.
7. Bubble Formation
When gas is injected through an orifice into a liquid, the Weber number (based on gas velocity at the orifice) controls bubble size. For $We_{gas} < 2$, discrete spherical bubbles form at the orifice tip (bubbling regime). For $We_{gas} > 2$–$4$, a continuous gas jet penetrates the liquid and breaks into irregular bubbles (jetting regime). The transition is used to control bubble size in bioreactors, metallurgical furnaces, and aerators.
8. Drop Impact on Surfaces
When a droplet impacts a solid surface, the outcome depends on We and the surface wettability:
- Spreading: We > 1; kinetic energy converts to surface energy as a thin lamella spreads outward
- Bouncing: We << 1 on superhydrophobic surfaces; surface tension rebounds the droplet
- Splashing: We > We_cr ≈ 80–500 (depending on surface roughness); unstable rim ejects secondary droplets
The maximum spreading diameter follows empirically:
$$rac{d_{max}}{d_0} pprox 0.61(We + 12)^{1/3}$$
Worked Example 4: Raindrop Impact on a Leaf
Raindrop: $d_0 = 3$ mm, $v_{impact} = 7$ m/s, $
ho = 1000$ kg/m³, $sigma = 0.073$ N/m. Find maximum spread diameter.
$$We = rac{1000 imes 49 imes 0.003}{0.073} = rac{147}{0.073} = 2014$$
$$d_{max} = 0.61 imes d_0 imes (We + 12)^{1/3} = 0.61 imes 3 ext{ mm} imes (2026)^{1/3} = 1.83 imes 12.65 = 23.1 ext{ mm}$$
The 3 mm drop spreads to over 23 mm — nearly 8 times its initial diameter. This explains the characteristic splash rings visible in slow-motion photography of rain on flat surfaces, and why the Lotus leaf’s microstructure (reducing effective $sigma$) so dramatically limits spreading.
9. IYPT 2027 — Problem P7: Sinking Funnel
IYPT 2027 Problem P7: Sinking Funnel
A funnel is submerged mouth-downward in water, then slowly withdrawn. As water drains out of the funnel and air tries to enter, what happens at the air–water interface?
Weber number analysis: The critical parameter is the Weber number of water flowing out through the funnel throat of diameter $D$:
$$We_{throat} = rac{
ho_{water} v_{throat}^2 D}{sigma}$$
Regime 1 — We < 1: Surface tension stabilises the air–water interface. Air enters as discrete, well-separated bubbles at regular intervals. The interface is pinned to the funnel edge.
Regime 2 — We ~ 1: The interface oscillates and the bubble-entry pattern becomes irregular. This is the most photogenic regime for IYPT experiments.
Regime 3 — We > 1: Inertia dominates; a continuous air column enters and the water-air exchange becomes turbulent and chaotic.
The critical velocity for interface instability: $v_{cr} = sqrt{sigma / (
ho D)}$, giving $We_{cr} = 1$.
For a funnel throat $D = 20$ mm and water: $v_{cr} = sqrt{0.073/(1000 imes 0.02)} = sqrt{0.00365} = 0.060$ m/s = 6 cm/s.
10. Surface Tension Values and We at Standard Conditions
| Fluid | $sigma$ (N/m) at 20°C | We at v=1 m/s, L=1 mm |
|---|---|---|
| Pure water | 0.0728 | 13.7 |
| Soapy water | 0.025–0.040 | 25–40 |
| Ethanol | 0.0223 | 35.9 |
| Mercury | 0.485 | 27.6 |
| Gasoline | 0.021 | 34.3 |
| Diesel fuel | 0.027 | 31.5 |
| Blood plasma | 0.050 | 21.3 |
11. Diesel Fuel Atomisation
Modern diesel injectors operate at pressures of 2000–3000 bar, producing exit velocities of 300–600 m/s through orifices of 100–300 µm. The Weber number:
$$We = rac{
ho_{fuel} v^2 d_{nozzle}}{sigma_{fuel}} = rac{850 imes 300^2 imes 2 imes10^{-4}}{0.027} pprox 5.7 imes 10^5$$
This enormous Weber number (far exceeding the catastrophic breakup threshold of ~350) ensures complete atomisation into droplets of 5–20 µm within 1–2 mm of the nozzle exit. The resulting high surface area (relative to volume) enables complete combustion in the short time available during the engine cycle.
12. Weber Number in Pharmaceutical Aerosols
Inhaled drug delivery requires droplets of 1–5 µm to reach the alveoli. Pressurised metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) and nebulisers exploit high We to atomise drug solutions. The challenge: We must be large enough to shatter the liquid into micron-scale droplets, but not so large that the droplets are too small (below 0.5 µm, droplets are exhaled without deposition). This narrow design window is navigated using the Ohnesorge diagram.
13. Related Dimensionless Numbers
| Number | Formula | Physical meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Ohnesorge Oh | $mu/sqrt{ ho sigma L}$ |
Viscous damping vs surface tension |
| Bond/Eötvös Bo | $ ho g L^2/sigma$ |
Gravity vs surface tension (bubble rise) |
| Capillary Ca | $mu v/sigma$ | Viscous flow vs surface tension (porous media) |
| Morton Mo | $gmu^4/( ho sigma^3)$ |
Bubble shape in viscous liquids |
| Laplace La | $ ho sigma L/mu^2 = We/Oh^2$ |
Surface tension vs viscosity²/inertia |
14. Key Equations Summary
Weber Number Toolkit
- Definition: $We =
ho v^2 L / sigma$ - Laplace pressure: $Delta p = 2sigma/r$ (single interface), $4sigma/r$ (soap bubble)
- Critical droplet breakup in airflow: $We_{cr} pprox 12$
- Rayleigh drop size: $d_{drop} pprox 1.89,d_{jet}$
- Ohnesorge number: $Oh = sqrt{We}/Re$
- Max spread diameter: $d_{max}/d_0 pprox 0.61(We+12)^{1/3}$
- Sinking funnel critical speed: $v_{cr} = sqrt{sigma/(
ho D)}$ (We = 1) - Bond number: $Bo = We/Fr^2 =
ho g L^2/sigma$
15. Quick-Reference: Weber Number Across Applications
| Application | Typical We | Regime / outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Morning dew on leaf | < 0.1 | Perfect sphere, no deformation |
| Raindrop (2 mm) | 3–8 | Stable, slightly oblate |
| Raindrop (5 mm) | 30–60 | Strongly deformed, near breakup |
| Dripping faucet | 1–20 | Rayleigh breakup, regular drops |
| Inkjet nozzle | 10–100 | Design operating window |
| Agricultural sprayer | 50–300 | Atomisation, 100–500 µm drops |
| Diesel injector | $10^5$–$10^6$ | Catastrophic atomisation, ~10 µm |
| Sinking funnel (IYPT P7) | ~ 1 (transition) | Discrete bubble vs. jetting |
Have a question? 🤔
If something isn't clear or you have a question, ask it here. The answer will be published on this page.
💬 جواب بهتری داری؟ یا یه سؤال جدید؟
اگه به سؤالای بالا پاسخی داری که فکر میکنی روشنتر یا کاملتر از مال منه، یا یه سؤال جدید برای دانشآموزای دیگه داری — تو بخش نظرات پایین صفحه ارسال کن. هر پیامی رو میخونم، تأیید میکنم و منتشر میشه. اینجوری همه از تجربهی همدیگه استفاده میکنیم. 🌱
